Build a minimal decorator with Ruby in 30 minutes
A few weeks ago, I needed to add some view-related methods to an object. Decorators are my go-to pattern to handle this kind of logic.
Normally, I’d use the draper gem to build decorators. But the app I’m working on used an older and incompatible version of Rails.
So I built a minimal decorator from scratch, added a bunch of extra behaviors, only to end up abstracting all of these away. Follow along!
What I’m working with
My Teacher
class has a handful of methods:
- A one-to-many relationship with the
Student
class. - Two public methods: one that exposes the maximum number of students a teacher can teach to, and one exposing the available teaching places.
class Teacher < ApplicationRecord
has_many :students
def maximum_number_of_students = 30
def available_places
(maximum_number_of_students <=> students.size).clamp(0..)
end
end
In my views, I want to display a table of teachers where the number of available places for each teacher is backed by a background colour.
# teachers/index.html.erb
<table class="table table-striped">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Name of the teacher</th>
<th>Available places</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<% teachers.each do |teacher| %>
<tr>
<td><%= teacher.full_name %></td>
<td class="<%= teacher.colour_coded_availability %>">
<%= teacher.available_places %>
</td>
</tr>
<% end %>
</tbody>
</table>
I could write the Teacher#colour_coded_availability
method in my model like so:
class Teacher < ApplicationRecord
has_many :students
def maximum_number_of_students = 30
def available_places
(maximum_number_of_students <=> students.size).clamp(0..)
end
def colour_coded_availability
case available_places
when 0 then "bg-colour-red"
else "bg-colour-green"
end
end
end
However, models are not the place for methods generating CSS classes. Decorators are!
Drafting a decorator
My decorator should accept an instance of Teacher
and expose the colour_coded_availability
public method.
# app/decorators/teacher_decorator.rb
class TeacherDecorator
attr_reader :teacher
def initialize(teacher:)
@teacher = teacher
end
def colour_coded_availability
case teacher.available_places
when 0 then "bg-colour-red"
else "bg-colour-green"
end
end
end
Now, I can instantiate my decorator and use it in my views:
# app/controllers/teachers_controller.rb
class TeachersController < ApplicationController
def index
@teachers = Teacher.all.map { TeacherDecorator.new(teacher: _1) }
end
end
# teachers/index.html.erb
<table class="table table-striped">
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Name of the teacher</th>
<th>Available places</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<% @teachers.each do |teacher| %>
<tr>
<td><%= teacher.full_name %></td>
<td class="<%= teacher.colour_coded_availability %>">
<%= teacher.available_places %>
</td>
</tr>
<% end %>
</tbody>
</table>
When I can call teacher.colour_coded_availability
in my views, the method retrieves a CSS class and adds it to the HTML <td>
tag.
But if I were to run this code as is, I’d get a beautiful NoMethodError
. Why?
My views do not handle instances of Teacher
anymore. They handle instances of TeacherDecorator
. So, when I’m calling the public methods defined on Teacher
, the decorator doesn’t know what to do with them.
My decorator needs to be able to handle both its own public methods and the public methods defined on the underlying record (Teacher
, in this case).
And we do that by using Ruby’s method_missing
.
Ruby’s method_missing
to the rescue
method_missing
is how Ruby handles method calls made on objects where said methods are not defined. Ruby passes the method call along the ancestry chain until it can either resolves it or raises a NoMethodError
.
When I call @teacher.full_name
, I want my decorator to rescue the NoMethodError
, and forward #full_name
to the underlying instance of Teacher
.
To do that, I need to re-open Ruby’s method_missing
, add a custom behavior, then allow method_missing
to run its normal course.
class TeacherDecorator
attr_reader :teacher
def initialize(teacher)
@teacher = teacher
end
def availability_as_background
case teacher.max_number_of_students <=> teacher.available_places
when -1 then "background-danger"
when 0 then "background-warning"
when 1 then "background-success"
end
end
private
def method_missing(method, ...)
return teacher.public_send(method, ...) if teacher.respond_to?(method)
super
end
def respond_to_missing?(name, include_private = false)
teacher.respond_to?(name) || super
end
end
In this example, I keep the original signature of Ruby’s method_missing
.
The only thing I tweak is forwarding the method call to the underlying teacher
. I only forward it if the teacher
responds to the method. Then, I let Ruby resume its original behavior 1.
Now, @teacher.full_name
is properly forwarded to the underlying instance of Teacher
.
What would be cool now, is to allow other decorators to share this behavior.
Normalizing the behavior to create other decorators
One way to gather default behavior shared across various decorators is to rely on inheritance. I can create an ApplicationDecorator
whose job is to handle instantiation, and forwarding method calls to the underlying record.
Then, I can have my TeacherDecorator
inherit from the ApplicationDecorator
.
class ApplicationDecorator
def initialize(record)
@record = record
end
private
attr_reader :record
def method_missing(method,...)
if record.respond_to?(method)
record.public_send(method, ...)
else
super
end
end
def respond_to_missing?(name, include_private = false)
record.respond_to?(name) || super
end
end
class TeacherDecorator < ApplicationDecorator
attr_reader :teacher
def availability_as_background
case teacher.max_number_of_students <=> teacher.available_places
when -1 then "background-danger"
when 0 then "background-warning"
when 1 then "background-success"
end
end
private
alias_method :teacher, :record
end
My TeacherDecorator
doesn’t need to bother about its initialization since it’s handled by the parent ApplicationDecorator
. The only thing I added, is the ability to reference the record
as teacher
so it’s clearer what kind of record we’re working with.
Ensure Rails default behavior works well
Some Rails native helpers will have a hard time handling my decorator.
Consider this code:
`edit_teacher_path(@teacher)` # => Should generate teachers/1/edit
But if @teacher
references an instance of my TeacherDecorator
, the generated path is teachers/#TeacherDecorator/edit
.
How do I make my decorator integrate with Rails default behavior?
I can re-open the to_param
method which is responsible for turning (among other things) a record into its id
, and delegating its behavior to the record.
class ApplicationDecorator
def initialize(record)
@record = record
end
delegate :to_param, to: :record
private
attr_reader :record
def method_missing(method,...)
if record.respond_to?(method)
record.public_send(method, ...)
else
super
end
end
def respond_to_missing?(name, include_private = false)
record.respond_to?(name) || super
end
end
Of course, forwarding every Rails default behaviors to the underlying record is not a great strategy (too much complexity). So, how should I do it?
Use Ruby standard SimpleDelegator
SimpleDelegator provides the means to delegate all supported method calls to the object passed into the constructor.
This means that by using SimpleDelegator, I can remove the initialization and the delegation logics from my ApplicationDelegator
.
require "delegate"
class ApplicationDecorator < SimpleDelegator ; end
Everything is abstracted away. And it just works™. @record
is not available anymore for my TeacherDecorator
to reference, but SimpleDelegator exposes a __getobj__
that works exactly as my previous @record
ivar.
Final implementation
Here’s what I ended up with:
require "delegate"
class ApplicationDecorator < SimpleDelegator ; end
class TeacherDecorator < ApplicationDecorator
def availability_as_background
case teacher.max_number_of_students <=> teacher.available_places
when -1 then "background-danger"
when 0 then "background-warning"
when 1 then "background-success"
end
end
alias_method :teacher, :__getobj__
end
That’s it! A 30-minute minimal decorator in plain Ruby.
Cheers,
Rémi - @remi@ruby.social
PS: I'm available for hire.
-
respond_to_missing?
only ensures that theresponds_to?
does not return false positives by allowing the decorator to respond to methods even if they are not statically defined on it. ↩